For advocates in Pakistan
Type what happened. Lawyerly sets out the points your case turns on, and for each one, the authorities we actually hold — with what replaced the dead ones, and what the other side will cite.
5 cases free, with every feature · No card required
Whether the suit is barred by limitation, the plaint having been presented more than three years after performance fell due.
2019 SCMR 1106
Supreme Court · full text held · citation confirmed
PLD 2004 Lahore 388
Overruled — replaced by PLD 2016 SC 872
No authority on record yet
Not in our records — fetching it for you
What Lawyerly does
Nothing here is a claim about coverage. Every line is something you can check on the screen while you use it.
You describe the matter. Lawyerly returns the points a court must decide, in the order they would be argued — then you edit, merge, drop, or add the one it missed.
You decide what counts as a point. We propose.
Every authority carries its provenance: whether we hold the full text, and whether the citation is confirmed. Where we hold nothing, it says so instead of guessing.
Ask for a judgment we don't hold and it enters the fetch queue. When it lands, your map updates — and the next lawyer who needs it benefits too.
Demand-driven. Not a scrape.
When our records hold a possible overruling, the lawyer already reading that judgment can confirm or reject it in one click. Until one does, we warn — and name nothing.
Confirmed by a lawyer, or it stays a warning — never a name.
The same facts, flipped: the authorities the other side will cite, retrieved from the record — never our opinion of your case.
Both sides of the map, from one set of facts.
Briefs and annexures you upload are a thirty-day working cache, then they are gone. We keep the case's points and authorities — not your client's papers.
Judgments are public record. Client files are not.
— judgments held
— judgments held in total.
How we differ
You bring a query. It returns documents that match. Which of those judgments has been overruled, and what applies to your point today, is work you do afterwards — by reading.
You bring the facts. It returns the points, the authorities on each, what replaced the ones that were overruled, and what your opponent will cite — each line carrying the evidence behind it.
PLS and Eastlaw are libraries — you search them. Lawyerly starts from your case and shows the state of the law on each point, with the evidence behind every claim. We do not claim a bigger library than theirs. We claim a different job, and we show our working.
Pricing
Free is not a crippled tier. It is every feature, on 5 cases.
₨0
5 cases
₨3,000 / month
Up to 100 cases